Must we have urine testing for Welfare applicants?
Like a lot of folks in the United States, I have a job. I perform, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as they see fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am necessary to pass a random urine test, which I have no difficulty with. And the principal reason I have no dilemma with a drug test is since I have nothing to hide. What I do have a difficulty with is the distribution of my taxes to people who are doing drugs and never have to pass an urine test.
Shouldn’t 1 have to pass an urine test to get a welfare check, since I have to pass one to earn it for them?
Please understand, I have no issue with helping individuals get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have an issue with helping an individual sit on their butt. Could you imagine how a lot income the state would save if individuals had to pass an urine test to get a public assistance check?
A 1999 Michigan law called for a pilot plan of random substance abuse testing in at least 3 counties. Drug testing began at the starting of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a designated location of Western Wayne County, which includes some of Detroit’s west side neighborhoods.
All the new applicants for that region had to supply an urine sample to officials or give up their right to any government aid. In addition, any applicants already in the program had to submit to random testing.
A class action lawsuit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days prior to schedule testing. The suit charges that the system violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. Two Michigan mothers and a Detroit organization (The Westside Mothers) had been named in the suit. The organization focuses on representing hundreds of welfare recipients and their households. Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan says, “The Fourth Amendment guarantees that no individual in this country can be subjected to a search by the government unless there is reasonable suspicion that they have committed some crime, welfare recipients might be poor, but that’s not a crime not yet, anyway.”
I have spoken to a quantity of folks in person and on forums about their thoughts and the ones that oppose this have the identical stance, that it is unconstitutional. In my opinion, it appears that I am not pushing random drug test onto any random citizen. The welfare recipient chooses to get help from the government. So just like submitting paperwork, you must submit an urine sample. Yet another stance men and women speak about is false positives. Well if they claim false positive, then do a hair follicle test.
If urine test are unconstitutional, then scrap the complete welfare plan. Let your voice be heard on Political Majority.com.
To learn more : pass drug test talk
Related Posts
Tags
Share This
Recent Comments